Michelle Larcher De Brito
unrankedPOR · Right-handed · 165cm
Surface ratings
overall 1502 · 13 matchesHard
1488
-13 vs overall
provisional
Clay
—
0 matches
not rated
Grass
1504
+2 vs overall
provisional
strongest
Michelle Larcher De Brito is an all-rounder: only 16 rating points separate the best and worst surface, so the court makes little difference to how the model reads a match. The hard and grass figures are provisional — fewer than 20 matches behind them.
Last 10
4-6 in the last 10 · 0 wins over a top-20 opponent.
2026 season
Hard
—
Clay
—
Grass
—
- Versus the current top 10: no meetings this season.
- Deciding sets: no completed deciders on file.
- Opponent standing uses today's ranking, not the ranking on the day of the match.
Workload
0
matches, 14 days
0
matches, 30 days
3512
days since last
There is no injury or withdrawal feed for tennis that we can read, so nothing here says whether a player is fit. Matches played and days off the court are the observable proxies, and a long gap can equally mean a break in the calendar.
Our track record on this player
Loading…
Recent results
- WDea HerdzelasFed Cup G1 REL: BIH vs POR · Hard · 2017-02-116-1 6-2
- LJohanna KontaFed Cup G1 RR: GBR vs POR · Hard · 2017-02-102-6 4-6
- LJelena Ostapenko#32Fed Cup G1 RR: LAT vs POR · Hard · 2017-02-104-6 2-6
- WCagla BuyukakcayFed Cup G1 RR: TUR vs POR · Hard · 2017-02-106-1 3-6 6-4
- WLaura RobsonNottingham · Grass · 2016-06-066-3 7-5
- LMonica PuigNottingham · Grass · 2016-06-064-6 0-6
- LAna KonjuhFed Cup G1 PM: POR vs CRO · Hard · 2016-02-062-6 2-6
- LRebecca PetersonFed Cup G1 RR: SWE vs POR · Hard · 2016-02-046-7(5) 4-6
- LLesia TsurenkoFed Cup G1 RR: UKR vs POR · Hard · 2016-02-032-6 3-6
- WSaisai ZhengBirmingham · Grass · 2015-06-156-3 6-2
- WAna IvanovicBirmingham · Grass · 2015-06-156-4 3-6 7-6(6)
- LDaniela HantuchovaBirmingham · Grass · 2015-06-154-6 5-7
- WStephanie VogtFed Cup G1 PO: LIE vs POR · Hard · 2015-02-077-6(7) 7-5
We hold only 13 completed matches for this player, so every figure above rests on a small sample. Ratings on surfaces with little history are pulled back toward the overall number rather than presented as if they were settled.
Surface ratings shown are effective Elo: the raw surface rating regressed toward the player's overall figure in proportion to how many matches sit behind it.